conclusive proof in Intelligent Design? The advance of a new theory?
Question by Sly Fox [King of Fools]: conclusive proof in Intelligent Design? The advance of a new theory?
Is the appendix conclusive proof that the theory of intelligent design is fallible?
And if so can we now reconsider it as being more a form of roughly intelligent design with a certain error rate?
And should school be teaching the greater complexities of roughly Intelligent design, and the error rate which occurs within it?
Just for greater understanding.
Some people are talking about this!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21153898/
That’s the theory from surgeons and immunologists at Duke University Medical School,
The press report is simplistic. but read the paper and you will see that it is where gems live and not a place which produces them!
No difference you may think, but there is a world of difference!
The Appendix exist in other animals and serve a purpose just as the stomach. but if you remove the appendix people don’t have health problems, however it would be very difficult to live without a stomach.
And as for talking about it, if it wasn’t there????
Best answer:
Answer by tylertxan
Nope, the courts have already decided that creationism and I>D. are religion in disguise and can not be taught in public school science classes. If you want kids taught ID or creationism enroll them in the religious school of your choice. A private school may teach anything it wishes.
Add your own answer in the comments!
Color wheel chart mixing theory painting tutorial
http://www.paintbasket.com/paintbaskettv/ to Watch our Live Colour Mixing Webinar Visit http://www.paintbasket.com for more art lessons like this one on how …
CHECK OUT THE RESPONSE VIDEO – Funny Crazy BIG CAT SOUNDS!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHZm52nvBB4&feature=channel !!!GET THE FREE LION ROAR RINGTONE…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Evolution Is Only A Theory
Science & Reason on Facebook: tinyurl.com Evolution Is Only A Theory – Richard Dawkins @ Pop!Tech (Part 3). — Subscribe to Science & Reason: • www.YouTube.com • www.YouTube.com • www.YouTube.com • www.YouTube.com — Richard Dawkins believes sciences ability to admit ignorance is one of its greatest strengths. On the flip side, he proposes that faith remains arrogant and all too certain of its validity without any rational set of proofs.Richard Dawkins is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science author. He was formerly Professor for Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He was voted Britain’s leading public intellectual by readers of Prospect magazine and was named one of Time Magazine’s “100 Most Influential People” for 2007. Dawkins came to prominence with his 1976 book “The Selfish Gene”, which popularised the gene-centred view of evolution and introduced the term “meme”. He is a prominent critic of creationism and intelligent design. In his 1986 book “The Blind Watchmaker”, he argued against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he described evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker. He has since written several popular science books, and makes regular television and radio appearances, predominantly discussing these topics. Dawkins is an atheist, secular humanist, sceptic, scientific rationalist, and supporter of …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Is the theory of Unintelligent Design different from Intelligent Design and Evolution? How is it different?
Question by Sean: Is the theory of Unintelligent Design different from Intelligent Design and Evolution? How is it different?
Evolution – man evolved from apes/monkeys, whatever
Intelligent Design – we are so complex we require a creator
Unintelligent Design – we’re screwed up – our creator is stupid.
I propose that if we are to teach children an alternative to Evolution, intelligent design, since Evolution has never been proven a fact, that we also teach the alternative theory of unintelligent design, that we are really screwed up people, created by a “stupid creator”.
I propose this as a non-offensive theory that is different from evolution and intelligent design, both of which have never been proven as fact.
What do you think?
Best answer:
Answer by piraterachel
we’re not ALL screwed up, I think. What about those amazing gymnists that seem almost able to fly with their practically perfect bodies? I wouldn’t consider myself screwed up if I could do that stuff. But, that theory might be depressing for some students, and hilarious for the rest of them. And, it might make them feel like they have a liscense to misbehave more if they are a “stupid creation” in their own minds. Cheers Imzarray
Add your own answer in the comments!
does the theory of creationism and intelligent design just make americans look stupid?
Question by lionel b: does the theory of creationism and intelligent design just make americans look stupid?
Best answer:
Answer by Sun
Yes
Add your own answer in the comments!
Christians/believers? Have you heard of a variation of Intelligent Design theory that people call “SD theory”?
Question by Sevil Natas: Christians/believers? Have you heard of a variation of Intelligent Design theory that people call “SD theory”?
This is kinda how SD-theory goes:
1. Look at our universe! There have been so many failed galaxies, so many imploding stars, so many failed planets and solar systems destroyed by the forces and parameters that were apparently finely tuned so as to allow life to flourish.
2. Now look at our solar system, one of less than a dozen planets, the only one that we know of that has ever been hospitable to life. The other planets are simply too hot or cold to allow basic life to evolve let alone intelligent/conscious life that can form so called relationships with their creator, whom they presume cares for them and what they do and who they sleep with.
3. Now look at our planet. The only planet in our solar system that we know for certain has life. A planet in a galaxy in the deep corner of the univers. 90% of all life forms that have ever existed on this planet of ours have become extinct and failed to flourish. The majority of the planet is entirely inhospitable to life. Life forms only exist sparsely on the surface of the earth.
4. And for those who think Darwinian evolution is compatible with god, take a look at our human evolutionary history. Modern humans have been around for 100-200 thousand years. In the early periods in Africa, humans would have lived to 25 years only, because there was no medicine, very harsh climates, warefare, famine, theft and predators etc… Then suddenly after watching all of this SIN for 98000 years, their creator decides that he shall somehow “save his creations” by impregnating a jewish woman who will give birth to his “son”, who will be crucified in an ugly and sadistic bloody fashion, then rise back to heaven…… and this is supposed to all make it better.
5. And apparently this so called “Intelligent designer” chose for all of this to take place in some barbaric illiterate part of Palistine, instead of some place like China , which was already very literate and very progressive in science and technology.
*sighs* – I have two questions for you:
1. So you Christians and other believers want your god to be responsible for the reality of the universe and the world as I have described?
2. Does this look like intelligent design to you does it? Or perhaps “SD theory” is more suitable (i.e. Stupid Design Theory)… Afterall, this is evidence of “stupid design” isn’t it???
(please as always, no rude answers)
Best answer:
Answer by JohnFromNC
You should review point #3. The only planet in the universe with life. The only planet God himself said he created. The only planet he walked on.
And you are forgetting one very important point. Sin. That brought death and proves God is not a liar.
Yes, design always has intelligence behind it.
What do you think? Answer below!
Q&A: does the theory of creationism and intelligent design just make americans look stupid?
Question by lionel b: does the theory of creationism and intelligent design just make americans look stupid?
Best answer:
Answer by imraybarbonifrommiami
Just as stupid as it makes scientist look for saying the universe collapses and expands just because.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Intelligent Design is a Testable Theory, Stupid!
Amateurs think that ID is not falsifiable or testable. If they actually knew what ID was, they’d know they’re wrong. Also see: www.youtube.com