Why do angry atheists assume that believers don’t believe in Science?
Question by wisemancumth: Why do angry atheists assume that believers don’t believe in Science?
I believe in evolution, cause and effect and I accept most of the mainstream theories of theoretical physics just as much as any scientist. I also believe that intelligent design is a possibility. How does evolution disprove God?
Most of the out spoken atheist have a knee jerk reaction to that theory. They also claim they believe in science but most physists actually believe in God or are agnostics. The angry atheist also claim science uses verifiable facts. That’s wrong. Parallel universe, multiple dimension and most of quantum physics theories haven’t been proven except through reason. There is also reason behind intelligent design. The big one is ‘we’re here’. I’m tired of the Angry atheist kindergarten arguments for why they don’t believe in the possibility of God. Grow up. Comparing leprechauns and Santa clause to a god that created the universe?
peter k. You have hair growing out of your ears because of genes and hormones. Maybe it’s also why you dont think.
why do character in movies do so many stupid thinks and get themselves into such crazy situations? Because the writer wanted it that way.
madhukar maybe Einstein and Newton didn’t fight because Einstein was born about a hundred years after Newton died.
entropy-rythm. Suspension of reason (faith) is another assumption atheists make. I have never given up on reason. I never would have finished college or been able to do my jobs in science if I had. Also, Everyone has faith. Everytime you get in your car you are having faith that your brakes wont give out.
every scientist has faith that their collegues results are corrects. They wouldn’t be able to continue their research if they were checking all the thousands of others research.
Best answer:
Answer by Peter K
As soon as you say “intelligent design” you lose all scientific credibility. If design is intelligent then how come hair is growing out of my ears? What sort of fool designed that?
It might be comforting and reassuring to think that somebody created us and is looking out for us but science has no opinion about whether this is in fact the case.
Give your answer to this question below!
Science, God and DawahFilms
This is a comment on the claims that science has established a natural propensity to a god in the human brain. I also show what the result is for people like DawahFilms, who don’t look for background information or don’t take a critical look at something which satisfies their immediate and superficial requirements. such as a headline. So they see the title of a paper which mentions science and something that would fit into their agenda and they take it on board without any checks. Sources: The papers www.ox.ac.uk www.sciencedaily.com www.cam.ox.ac.uk Templeton Foundation www.skepdic.com www.templeton-cambridge.org The childish beliefs of Dr Justin Barrett epiphenom.fieldofscience.com Comments skeptics.stackexchange.com www.templeton-cambridge.org The project papers www.cam.ox.ac.uk www.cam.ox.ac.uk www.cam.ox.ac.uk Why is your God special? www.youtube.com Most images are used under the Creative Commons license of Wellcome Images. 10 July 2010 23:31, copyright 2011 Background audio is an instrumental piece in the style of Superstition under Creative Commons licence or Fair Use. The usage of this footage follows the guidelines as laid out in section 107 (Fair Use) of the Copyright Act 1976 as it is used exclusively for analysis and criticism for non-profit educational purposes and thus does not require any permission from anyone. This video contains transformative information, does not infringe on the target audience of the critiqued video, is non-commercial, uses only the …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
“Ida” – THE MISSING LINK OR MISSING SCIENCE? – Evolution is falling apart at the seams!
ICHTHUS FILMS – The definitive ANSWER is in this film! IS Ida our ancestor? Has Evolution FINALLY found the “missing link” You will enjoy this! It seems the SILLY EVOLUTIONISTS are getting more and more desperate. In the face of growing advancements in REAL science technology – evolution is looking like the silly, pseudoscience that it is…more and more. IS this really the BEST they have? 😉 Believe it or not…THEY SAY “YES!” ENJOY!
Music ripped from my copy of the game. Now there aren’t anymore of those stupid voices like in the OST cd xD
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Q&A: Science Fair… Help!!! Ill give 20 points to the best answer?
Question by Bai:): Science Fair… Help!!! Ill give 20 points to the best answer?
I need a Science fair project for an 8th grader. It doesn’t have to be hard, but it has to be not like something a 4th grader would do. Here are the guidelines:
No animals all… sorry!!!
Science Project Topics to Avoid Why
Any topic that boils down to a simple preference or taste comparison. For example, “Which tastes better: Coke or Pepsi?” Such experiments don’t involve the kinds of numerical measurements we want in a science fair project. They are more of a survey than an experiment.
Most consumer product testing of the “Which is best?” type. This includes comparisons of popcorn, bubblegum, make-up, detergents, cleaning products, and paper towels. These projects only have scientific validity if the Investigator fully understands the science behind why the product works and applies that understanding to the experiment. While many consumer products are easy to use, the science behind them is often at the level of a graduate student in college.
Any topic that requires people to recall things they did in the past. The data tends to be unreliable.
Effect of colored light on plants Several people do this project at almost every science fair. You can be more creative!
Effect of music or talking on plants Difficult to measure.
Effect of running, music, video games, or almost anything on blood pressure The result is either obvious (the heart beats faster when you run) or difficult to measure with proper controls (the effect of music).
Effect of color on memory, emotion, mood, taste, strength, etc. Highly subjective and difficult to measure.
Any topic that requires measurements that will be extremely difficult to make or repeat, given your equipment. Without measurement, you can’t do science.
Graphology or handwriting analysis Questionable scientific validity.
Astrology or ESP No scientific validity.
Any topic that requires dangerous, hard to find, expensive, or illegal materials. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that requires drugging, pain, or injury to a live vertebrate animal. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that creates unacceptable risk (physical or psychological) to a human subject. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that involves collection of tissue samples from living humans or vertebrate animals. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
So, as you can see it is hard to find a good project.
Also, NO planes, or volcanoes.
The idea does not have to be original…
Also, please don’t give me a list of websites.. Give me ideas… and please explain them in some detail
and ill give 20 points to the best answer
Best answer:
Answer by Sukayna
what grade r u in??? im only in 7th!
What do you think? Answer below!
Science Fair!!! Help… I’ll give 20 points to the Best Answer!!!?
Question by Bai:): Science Fair!!! Help… I’ll give 20 points to the Best Answer!!!?
I need a Science fair project for an 8th grader. It doesn’t have to be hard, but it has to be not like something a 4th grader would do. Here are the guidelines:
No animals all… sorry!!!
Science Project Topics to Avoid Why
Any topic that boils down to a simple preference or taste comparison. For example, “Which tastes better: Coke or Pepsi?” Such experiments don’t involve the kinds of numerical measurements we want in a science fair project. They are more of a survey than an experiment.
Most consumer product testing of the “Which is best?” type. This includes comparisons of popcorn, bubblegum, make-up, detergents, cleaning products, and paper towels. These projects only have scientific validity if the Investigator fully understands the science behind why the product works and applies that understanding to the experiment. While many consumer products are easy to use, the science behind them is often at the level of a graduate student in college.
Any topic that requires people to recall things they did in the past. The data tends to be unreliable.
Effect of colored light on plants Several people do this project at almost every science fair. You can be more creative!
Effect of music or talking on plants Difficult to measure.
Effect of running, music, video games, or almost anything on blood pressure The result is either obvious (the heart beats faster when you run) or difficult to measure with proper controls (the effect of music).
Effect of color on memory, emotion, mood, taste, strength, etc. Highly subjective and difficult to measure.
Any topic that requires measurements that will be extremely difficult to make or repeat, given your equipment. Without measurement, you can’t do science.
Graphology or handwriting analysis Questionable scientific validity.
Astrology or ESP No scientific validity.
Any topic that requires dangerous, hard to find, expensive, or illegal materials. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that requires drugging, pain, or injury to a live vertebrate animal. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that creates unacceptable risk (physical or psychological) to a human subject. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
Any topic that involves collection of tissue samples from living humans or vertebrate animals. Violates the rules of virtually any science fair.
So, as you can see it is hard to find a good project.
Also, NO planes, or volcanoes.
The idea does not have to be original…
Also, please don’t give me a list of websites.. Give me ideas… and please explain them in some detail
and ill give 20 points to the best answer
Best answer:
Answer by Sehaj S
http://www.free-science-fair-projects.com/Science-Fair-Projects-Search.aspx?Grade=8&Category=All
go here and i think its going help 😀
answer mine ?? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsCzBh90zXmaMFwbNCjXL2Psy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20091118165256AA40vbK
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Knowledge of Science to Design Balloon-Powered Car?
Question by Grimm Chibi: Knowledge of Science to Design Balloon-Powered Car?
In science, we made balloon-powered cars. Question 6 asks, “Did you use your knowledge of science to guide your design? If so, in what way?”
I don’t really understand the question. We know that the heavier the car is, the slower it will move, but what principle of science is that? Also, we know that the faster the air can escape from the balloon, the faster the car will move. What do I write for our knowledge of science, though?
Sorry to bother you with such a stupid question. Thanks for the help.
Best answer:
Answer by Luke R
Newton’s second law is summarised by F=ma. The force on an object is equal to the mass times the acceleration. For the same force by the baloon, bigger mass will mean smaller acceleration and vice versa.
With the baloon pushing the air back, the conservation of momentum comes into play. The momentum in a closed system (the car) is constant so the momentum of the air moving back is equal to the momentum of the car moving forwards. Momentum M=mv where m is the mass and v is the velocity. The faster the mass of air is released the bigger the momentum and therefore the greater the velocity of the car.
Because the air is being let out over a period of time, not all at once the momentum transferred is not as simple as above. Newton’s second law comes into play as the car will have positive accereration so long as there is air being let out.
Always remember that friction will be slowing the car down.
Add your own answer in the comments!
NephsGuide – The Scholarship of NephilimFree, Scourge of Science
Text-based rebuttal to NephilimFree’s video: www.youtube.com NephilimFree needs an editor who can stomach his insanity. Someone who could tell him that, if you change the month on your article’s publication date, you should also get around to changing the day that follows it, too. This way you likely won’t run into having a date on your article in the future, on a non-existent date. And that ripping off Wikipedia is a bad idea, since people can so easily find this out. NephilimFree believes that the frameshift mutation that occurred in the Flavobacterium population had to have been intelligent design, because he butchers science badly (perhaps I should do a new Creationists Butcher Science on this, except an all-text-based one would be quite boring). He argues that the frameshift is due to a “Programmed Translational Frameshift Mutation” (I don’t know why he capitalized all the words . . .). One problem with this idea . . . Programmed translational frameshift mutations happen *after* translation. They are not part of the DNA. The mutation that occurs in this species of flavobacterium *is* embedded in the DNA. Poor NephilimFree . . . His ignorance and inability to write beyond a third-grader’s capacity makes him the worthless creationist we’ve come to mock on YouTube. Dunning and Kruger would be so proud of him.
Responding to guideoftheblind’s Version of “Science”
In this video, I explain why guideoftheblind is utterly and completely ignorant of what science is, and what it entails. Original video: www.youtube.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Mirror’s Edge is a game about…parkour, in the first person! So that makes it exciting! Let’s not remember the dumb story, awkward controls, and sometimes stupid game design. But hey, it’s unique and different, so at least it has that.
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Creation Science Investigates: Proving Jebus through food.
I could not make this up. This video is “proof of Intelligent Design”. Thanks to whoever sent this to PZ Meyers.
Video Rating: 3 / 5