Did everyone hear about the latest toy recall?
Posted by James on March 15, 2011 · 6 Comments
Question by Deborah P: Did everyone hear about the latest toy recall?
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09136.html
“Various Toys Recalled by CBB Group Due to Choking Hazard and Violation of Lead Paint Standard
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed.
Name of product: Fishing Games, Rattles, Pull-A-Long Cars, Mini Pull Back Cars, and Cartoon Bubble Guns
Units: About 39,000
Importer/Distributor: CBB Group Inc., City of Commerce, Calif.
Hazard: The fishing games, baby rattles and pull-a-long cars contain small parts, which can detach and pose a choking hazard to children. The mini pull back cars and bubble guns have surface paints which contain excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard.”
This is CRAZY..Shouldn’t they have more testing on toys like this?? What are your thoughts on the crazy amounts of lead in our child(s) toys??
Best answer:
Answer by My_Babies_Mommy
Thanks for the info!
Mother to 4 beautiful children with Twins due Sept. 2009 (Babies # 5 & 6)
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Thanks for the info. I don’t have any of those toys for my son and now I know not to buy them.
Thanks again! =)
it’s apalling. i try to only buy toys made in the U.S., which i usually have to buy online as most of the toys at the store are made in china. there is also a huge problem w/the toys sold at discount stores, they are often counterfiet & look just like the brand name toy. however they are made with inferior materials, such as lead.
My daughter used to love those little fishing games. She’d play with them in the tub. My son is far too little for toys. Besides stuffed animals I don’t think there’s any toys in the house but a big thanks for the heads up.
It is criminal – there is no excuse for making dangerous toys, especially the lead painted ones.
California has stricter laws concerning this, and certain countries in Europe too – there is no reason these laws can’t apply to ALL states.
Thank you for the information. Yes, they really should be testing these toys better, there’s no excuse for things like this to even be entering the market in the first place.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/safety-commission-says-no-toy-safety
Yesterday, after the summer’s spate of high-profile toy recalls, the Senate Commerce committee passed the most significant legislation affecting CPSC since the agency was created more than thirty years ago. Sponsored by Senator Mark Pryor (D-Arkansas), the bill increases CPSC’s budget from $63 million to $142.7 million by 2015, and raises the cap on civil penalties the agency can levy against companies that hide product defects, from $1.8 million to $100 million. The bill gives CPSC a couple of new responsibilities—the agency will credential independent third-party testing labs whose job it will be to safety-test toys, and it will have the authority to investigate and respond to safety-related whistleblower complaints made by company employees.
Acting CPSC chairman Nancy Nord opposes the bill. Voicing her objections in a five-page letter to the committee, Nord argued that CPSC would be overwhelmed by its new responsibilities, and that many of the bill’s provisions would do little more than increase litigation. Nord doesn’t think CPSC should be in charge of credentialing testing labs, she wants nothing to do with whistleblower complaints, and, using a bizarre logic that apparently makes sense to her (and to industry), concludes that increasing the civil penalty cap to $100 million will make it more likely that truly dangerous products will not reach CPSC’s radar screen. Overall, Nord said, the bill would have the “unintended consequence of hampering, rather than furthering consumer product safety.”
Most of Nord’s complaints are identical to those voiced by industry trade groups, chief among them, the National Association of Manufacturers, whose chief lobbyist, Michael Baroody, President Bush had nominated to fill Nord’s job a year earlier. (Baroody withdrew his nomination before this Senate confirmation hearings). House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) has called on Nord to resign. That the agency needs more resources and authority is clear, Pelosi said; the problem is that Nord simply does not understand “the gravity of the situation.”
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2007/11/youre-not-regulator-me-how-bush-administration-made-america-safe-dangerous-toysthe cpsc was created in 1972 with a broad range of powers. It could impose mandatory safety standards, ban or recall products found to be unsafe and dangerous, and levy fines on companies that hid safety information. Its job was to keep tabs on more than 15,000 types of consumer goods—just about everything you’d find in a Wal-Mart except food and drugs. By 1979, it had a budget of $44 million and a staff of nearly 900, whose investigations resulted in 545 recalls that year alone.
Then came the Reagan administration. Within months of taking office, Reagan convinced Congress to pass legislation that crippled the commission: Before it could impose mandatory standards on any product, it had to wait for industry to write its own standards, and then prove that they had failed. Recalls plummeted to fewer than 200 a year, and by 1988 the commission’s budget was down 22 percent and its staff had been cut almost in half.
But it was under Hal Stratton, George W. Bush’s commission chairman (and former New Mexico attorney general, as well as Lawyers for Bush cochair), that the commission turned from paper tiger to industry lapdog. Stratton cut back on investigations while taking full advantage of the perks of his office—he turned the agency into “a little travel bureau,” according to a longtime staffer. When a coalition of doctors and safety advocates asked him to look into the problem of adult-sized all-terrain vehicles marketed to kids, Stratton said he’d do a study. Three years (and more than 400 atv-related deaths of kids under 16) later, he released the results of fact-finding trips to West Virginia, New Mexico, and Alaska, where he’d met with safety advocates as well as various atv enthusiast groups. The upshot: a proposal to let kids ride even bigger, more powerful atvs.
Stratton’s departure in 2006 left the agency with a grim record—product-related deaths were up from 22,000 in 1998 to 27,000—and only two commissioners, one from each side of the aisle. Lacking a quorum, much of the commission’s work came to a halt. After waiting more than seven months to pick a new chairman, President Bush nominated a senior lobbyist for the very industry the commission regulates: Michael Baroody, of the National Association of Manufacturers. In May, Bush withdrew the nomination after it was disclosed that the association planned to give Baroody a $150,000 severance package when he took his new job. That left the cpsc’s Republican commissioner, Nancy Nord—the former director of consumer affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—in place as acting chairman; she had earlier shown her bona fides by turning down Senate Democrats who wanted to increase the commission’s budget. “I’m not