conclusive proof in Intelligent Design? The advance of a new theory?

Question by Sly Fox [King of Fools]: conclusive proof in Intelligent Design? The advance of a new theory?

Is the appendix conclusive proof that the theory of intelligent design is fallible?
And if so can we now reconsider it as being more a form of roughly intelligent design with a certain error rate?

And should school be teaching the greater complexities of roughly Intelligent design, and the error rate which occurs within it?
Just for greater understanding.
Some people are talking about this!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21153898/
That’s the theory from surgeons and immunologists at Duke University Medical School,
The press report is simplistic. but read the paper and you will see that it is where gems live and not a place which produces them!
No difference you may think, but there is a world of difference!
The Appendix exist in other animals and serve a purpose just as the stomach. but if you remove the appendix people don’t have health problems, however it would be very difficult to live without a stomach.
And as for talking about it, if it wasn’t there????

Best answer:

Answer by tylertxan
Nope, the courts have already decided that creationism and I>D. are religion in disguise and can not be taught in public school science classes. If you want kids taught ID or creationism enroll them in the religious school of your choice. A private school may teach anything it wishes.

Add your own answer in the comments!