Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin – Origin of Species – Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 3 / 7
Posted by James on January 15, 2011 · 25 Comments
Intelligent Design proved by – Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen – debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin – Origin of Species – Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Please watch all parts of this movie: Part 1: www.youtube.com Part 2: www.youtube.com Part 3: www.youtube.com Part 4: www.youtube.com Part 5: www.youtube.com Part 6: www.youtube.com Part 7: www.youtube.com Thank you for watching ! Tags: % can science prove that evolution in wrong? %* can science prove Existence of God? New York Times can science prove the the – universe was created? () (_)can science prove creation? can science disprove God? can science disprove creation? can science disprove evolution? Who created the universe? % What created the universe? How did everything begin? How did everything start? Is there a God who created the earth? Is there a God who created the universe? Do we %_ -,- % know everything about evolution? Tags (-): Do we know everything about creation? %* Is there a proof of creation? % Is there anybody out there? Is the truth is out there? Can we rely on science . regarding the evolution? Can we rely on Bible regarding the creation? Can we understand the creation of all things? ^*%$ Can we understand the evolution of all things?
Video Rating: 0 / 5
I like Darwin. He was intelligent, and willing to change his ideas when they proved to be wrong. Unlike his fanatical followers who’s mindsets are more like those of the Spanish Inquisition, under a vaneer of Liberalism.
@5tonyvvvv “the Bible and Jesus has not done any harm to mankind”
Wow… what it must be like to live such a delusional life is beyond me! The Bible itself is full of murder and rape in God’s name! LOL
@5tonyvvvv Second correction. “this was proven wrong 60 years ago” What was proven wrong 60 years ago? Abiogenesis? You cannot seriously be talking about the Urey-Miller experiments, can you? If so, you are utterly ignorant with respect to biology and science. They created a organic molecules from non-organics! This was a HUGE step forward in the origin of life research. Are you really so moronic as to think that, because no life came out of the test tubes, that it somehow disproves abiogensis?!
@5tonyvvvv Corrections… first, ‘atheists’, or religion, has nothing to do with the facts of biology. The truth be told, the MAJORITY, the vast majority of people who accept evolution are Christian. LIkewise, most biologists believe in a God. This is a pathetic attempt to couple the ‘evil atheists’ with biology in an attempt to make the concepts look bad. This only serves to show that you will be behave dishonestly in order to show your point. Sad… very sad.
@mooseflier well atheist have some faith..with ZERO chemistry to back some primitive cell by chance..this was proven wrong 60 years ago..all we do now is copy information code like what venter did..
@5tonyvvvv “It is? a universally accepted fact of chemistry that chirality cannot be created in chemical molecules by a random process.or in a test? tube”
Are people really this ignorant? One has to wonder how such people make it through daily life… how they pay their bill or feed themselves.
watch?v=SdwTwNPyR9w
Wow this film is turning me Christian I think because I said “oh Jesus!” at 6.12 when the fricken picture of a house came on the screen!
@5tonyvvvv What about burning witches? Teaching the lies as if they were truths? It is full of bull. Seriously, a talking snake? adam and eve? more bull. parting the red sea? killing the first born? ALL bull. get real. Created the earth and the universe and the heavens in six days? Its sickening.
@5tonyvvvv Again opposing thumbs and other evolution happenings are for reasons.
@MrJohnnyrace religion is not keeping anyone in the dark ages!!!..Your so Ignorant !!!!!!..the Bible and Jesus has not done any harm to mankind…U make up lies and twist the Truth!!!..stop avoiding Jesus and God.. u Foolish man
@MrJohnnyrace It did not happen there is NO CHEMISTRY TO BACK IT UP!!!!..U stupid old man..In regards to RNA/DNA – could you please explain the problem of Chirality?
Although Miller and Urey formed amino acids in their experiments in 1952 – all the amino acids that formed lacked Chirality.!!
It is a universally accepted fact of chemistry that chirality cannot be created in chemical molecules by a random process.or in a test? tube
they ? believe in some chemistry unknown to science.
@5tonyvvvv But it did happen. You show me how creationists over the centurys have when not understanding things presumed “it must be a god being” attitude. In last century we have discovered DNA, found that germs are not demons, cloaned animals, cured small pox, mapped the human genome, built a bionic eye, cured multiple diseases all because we were wanting to make the world a better place. Not stay in the dark ages of religous superstitions
@MrJohnnyrace Even under Great conditions scientists cant even make a one single protein!!!..u say it happened by time and chance in some primordial Goo..ATHEISTS HAVE AMAZING FAITH MAN!!
@MrJohnnyrace Given billions ..WOW u have some faith,thats not science by the way!!
@5tonyvvvv NOT YET. Science in America is only a couple hundred years of research. Given billions of years, it happened.
@5tonyvvvv Your the one making lame arguments. What do aposing thumbs have to do with creation by a supreme being?? Get serious. You are making assumptions not facts.
@MrJohnnyrace U and ken? miller would make a great used car? salesmen,his assumptions dont function,,he makes no sense..he would try to sell u a car that had no transmission..and say it will get u down the road just fine..just like a so called primitive cell could live and self replicate only having 3 or 4 amino acids..Fuckin imposible!!..science cant assemble one single amino acid or protein !!!!.
@MrJohnnyrace Cells without these molecular machines would be doomed at the first sign of trouble. The machines are the repair mechanism as well as reproductive capacity. If those go, life ends and? is never propagated…a cell could live with just one protein..what bullshit
scientists have tried to assemble DNA AND RNA and bases outside of the cell ..and its? impossible,,they both dissolve in water..
@MrJohnnyrace so what evolved first RNA or the repair mechanisms??..u have no chemistry to back it up just bullshit assumptions!!
@MrJohnnyrace U morons think a bacteria cell changing to resist a new drug is proof of evolution..its still a BACTERIA CELL.!!!.with no new information..tests have shown when cells are removed from the new drug..they go right back to producing the same bacteria cell..
@5tonyvvvv Obviously you dont understand cell replication and the rate even a simple virus mutates. Most of the creationists dont understand that a humans generation takes aprox. 20 years. A cell or virus divides and mutates many times in a 48 hr. period. Thus over a several million year old time frame they have divided and possibly mutated billions of times with no great or unusual activity.
@MrJohnnyrace In regards to RNA/DNA – could you please explain the problem of Chirality?
Although Miller and Urey formed amino acids in their experiments in 1952 – all the amino acids that formed lacked Chirality.!!
It is a universally accepted fact of chemistry that chirality cannot be created in chemical molecules by a random process.or in a test? tube
they ? believe in some chemistry unknown to science.
@MrJohnnyrace ..so what came first RNA..or the repair mechanisms..or the molecular machines??…u have a Major Paradox….lets hear some more of your bullshit assumptions..
Creationism is crap.